the lectern banner

By Steve Kelman

Blog archive

The new Office of American Innovation -- let's give Trump credit

Shutterstock image: light bulb with gears.

Listening to the TV news on Monday morning, I heard a brief story about an order from President Donald Trump to create an Office of American Innovation, to be headed by Jared Kushner and staffed by various business executives helping out on a part-time basis. Despite the office’s name, its goal will not be to spur innovation in the U.S. economy in general, but rather to spur innovation in government management.

It was remarkable to me that a story on improving government management had actually made the morning news (on NBC at least). The Washington Post also had a detailed story on this initiative.

I do not generally count myself as a Trump fan, but if we are going to be fair minded, we must be willing to give credit where credit is due. This initiative has the potential to be a home run for the American people.

Last week I blogged about the administration’s management agenda. Having expressed skepticism in posts just after the election about whether Trump's administration would have a government management improvement agenda at all, I last week expressed happiness at how the tone of the budget document was closely tied to a non-ideological mainstream good government agenda for improving the performance of government.

When I wrote that post, however, I will confess that I wondered to what extent the words in the budget document simply reflected the views of its author, former OPM Director Linda Springer, and might not have gotten any attention from more-senior administration officials.

The creation of the new innovation office puts those fears to rest.

What do I like about the announcement of this new office? How do I count the ways?

The first thing I like is that the Post story noted that Trump sees this effort in the context of something he did 30 years ago to help renovate the Wollman Ice Skating Rink in Central Park. According to Wikipedia, “The rink was closed in 1980 for a proposed two years of renovations at $9.1 million. Six years and $13 million later, after the problem-plagued work was still not completed by the city, Donald Trump persuaded Mayor Ed Koch to let him complete the work in four months at $3 million in order to have it open by the end of the year. Koch initially objected but later agreed to Trump's proposal when Trump offered to pay for the renovations himself with the stipulation that he be allowed to run the venue and an adjacent restaurant and use the profits to recoup his costs.

According to the Post article, “Trump sees the innovation office as a way to institutionalize" that sort of business-driven effort. Hope Hicks, the president’s spokeswoman, said Trump “recognized where the government has struggled with certain projects and he was someone in the private sector who was able to come in and bring the resources and creativity needed and ultimately execute in an efficient, cost-effective, way.” The goal is what friends of good government seek, which is improvement in government performance.

I already knew about this old effort and had once written about this in my book, Procurement and Public Management. I was a little surprised that Trump even remembered that he had done this so long ago, though perhaps I shouldn’t have been. The Wollman Rink was both an admirable hands-on effort by a business leader to help out government, and also hopefully a way to help share lessons learned with the city about, in this case, ways to improve the procurement process.

So can the new innovation office bring more of the same? “Viewed internally as a SWAT team of strategic consultants, the office will be staffed by former business executives,” the Post writes, “and is designed to infuse fresh thinking into Washington, float above the daily political grind and create a lasting legacy for a president still searching for signature achievements.“ The article quotes a statement by Trump to the paper: “All Americans, regardless of their political views, can recognize that government stagnation has hindered our ability to properly function, often creating widespread congestion and leading to cost overruns and delays. ... I promised the American people I would produce results, and apply my ‘ahead of schedule, under budget’ mentality to the government.”

The use of business executives in Trump’s new efforts may remind some of the Reagan administration’s Grace Commission, headed by Peter Grace, then CEO of the W. R. Grace Co. The business executives working on the Grace Commission were directed to produce examples of waste that made agencies look bad. (I wrote about the Grace Commission at the time, and found that essentially none of their headline-grabbing examples of waste panned out when you examined them further.) However, the new innovation office is rejecting that approach in favor of a more-collaborative and less-confrontational one.

One of the leaders of the effort is quoted in the Post piece as saying that “they did not see themselves as an imperious force dictating changes but rather as a ‘service organization’ offering solutions.” This is refreshing just because it is so rare in discussions of public management, especially when the discussions get into the more public or political realm.

Even Democrats, who don’t share the hostility to government of most traditional Republicans, frequently cannot avoid the temptation when discussing government management to drift into the language of waste, fraud, and abuse, and to state or imply agency incompetence or malfeasance. The approach of the Trump administration sets an example not just for Republicans but for Democrats as well.

The Post story tellingly noted that the effort was being led by Jared Kushner, one of the least-ideological people in the administration, and that the initiative did not include Steve Bannon, the ideologue whose management agenda, such as it is, is to “deconstruct the administrative state.” Kushner’s involvement, given his closeness to the president, sends a fantastic signal to people in the agencies that the president takes this seriously, a signal stronger than any president has ever sent before.

“At least to start,” the story says, “the team plans to focus its attention on reimagining Veterans Affairs; modernizing the technology and data infrastructure of every federal department and agency; remodeling workforce-training programs; and developing ‘transformative projects’ under the banner of Trump’s $1 trillion infrastructure plan, such as providing broadband Internet service to every American.”

This is a great list. Trump team, good luck!

Posted by Steve Kelman on Mar 27, 2017 at 8:28 PM


Nominate Today!

Nominations for the 2018 Federal 100 Awards are now being accepted, and are due by Dec. 23. 

Featured

Reader comments

Fri, Mar 31, 2017

Thoughtful analysis, as expected. But regardless of Jared's brain power and smooth style, and, discounting his inexperience, one would not expect a competent performance from this White House. Jared will have help, much of it uninvited. Expect a major FUBAR--that's what many experts think. It will be in the noise level, however, and won't do much damage.

Tue, Mar 28, 2017 Bruce Waltuck

Steve, in addition to my own detailed post about this on FB and elsewhere, I'd add a comment here. Your reference to the Wollman rink is significant for other reasons. The offer to fix something with a proviso to take over its ownership, operation, and revenue stream, is precisely the option DJT has suggested for America's infrastructure repairs. I'll defer to others on the merits of privatizing our highways and bridges. With regard to good government and efforts to improve, I am not enthused by either the "SWAT" moniker (typically associated with response to dangerous crises, and para-military gear), or the "government as business" mantra. For many years, I have advocated RIGHT-SIZED government. Agencies adequately funded to have the people and resources necessary to accomplish their missions. Effectively and efficiently, with both accountability and commitment to continual learning, adaptation, and improvement. The biggest obstacle to this that I know of, is the failure to distinguish truly complex challenges (with no knowable solutions) from the technical ones (where experts know what will work). Time and time again, managers treat the former as if they were the latter. We can, and must do better.

Tue, Mar 28, 2017

For someone who doesn't generally count himself as a Trump fan, you spend an awful lot of time writing fawning articles about his ideas. It's gotten to the point that I can barely stand to click on anything you publish anymore.

Mon, Mar 27, 2017 Bill Harshaw Reston, VA

"a great list"? Really? It's way too big for a small office led by someone new to government. The only thing going for him is the clout of his father-in-law, but Kushner himself has too many other assignments. The likelihood is he'll get pulled into one or two of them, those which seem more promising and rewarding, and slight the others, leaving the field open for someone with pet ideas to try to incorporate into the bureaucracy.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group