Workforce Wonk

By Alyah Khan

Blog archive

Reduce contractor use, cut federal managers to lower costs, readers advise

In the last Workforce Wonk entry, I posed the question of whether a targeted increase in the number of federal employees could more effectively reduce the deficit than across-the-board workforce cuts. A number of Federal Computer Week readers responded with their thoughts about how to drive down government spending, generally disregarding the notion of slashing the number of feds as a “highly symbolic” and “wrong-headed” gesture.

Reader suggestions included hiring fewer contractors, improving IT systems or changing the supervisor to employee ratio. 

“As someone who has been both a government employee, and, as the result of an outsourcing effort, a contractor, I can definitely state that it is costing the government more to have me working for them now than it did when I was an employee,” one wrote.

Another added, “I’ve said it many times, contractors are ideal for short-term fixed contracts that have an end state. Long-term indefinite projects require civilians that have the experience and knowledge to do the job and train the younger folks. Few contractors can fit this bill and the ones that can, should be hired as 'civilian' employees."

"For 35 years it seems that for every 'worker bee' that is contracted out, three contractors are hired at twice the pay each to do their work," wrote a reader identifed as Daryl. "If you are determined to reduce the number of government employees try setting your sites higher -- middle management or executive levels, GS-14 and above. Increas[ing] the supervisor to worker ratio would get more bang for the buck."

Others noted that investing in IT systems could further streamline government operations.

“I happen to believe that IT solutions could automate about two-thirds of civil agency operations and shake loose as many salary-benefit packages,” another wrote.

However, a few readers don’t seem to think that simply hiring more feds is the solution. “Hiring more people to cut costs is insane,” one reader concluded.

It looks like the government will have to survey its workforce options, possibly cutting here and adding there, until it finds the right balance in today’s belt-tightening environment.

Posted by Alyah Khan on Mar 04, 2011 at 12:20 PM


Featured

  • Telecommunications
    Stock photo ID: 658810513 By asharkyu

    GSA extends EIS deadline to 2023

    Agencies are getting up to three more years on existing telecom contracts before having to shift to the $50 billion Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions vehicle.

  • Workforce
    Shutterstock image ID: 569172169 By Zenzen

    OMB looks to retrain feds to fill cyber needs

    The federal government is taking steps to fill high-demand, skills-gap positions in tech by retraining employees already working within agencies without a cyber or IT background.

  • Acquisition
    GSA Headquarters (Photo by Rena Schild/Shutterstock)

    GSA to consolidate multiple award schedules

    The General Services Administration plans to consolidate dozens of its buying schedules across product areas including IT and services to reduce duplication.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.