GAO: Departments lag on FISMA controls
Inadequate tools and inconsistent guidance have been challenges for the Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State departments, a new report states.
Some of the agencies most critically involved with the countrys security still have not fully implemented key provisions of the Federal Information Security Management Act five years after the act was passed. The Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State departments especially face challenges in establishing information security control activities that FISMA and the Office of Management and Budget require, the Government Accountability Office said.The challenges for these agencies arose from various weaknesses, such as inadequate tools and gaps and inconsistencies in guidance, GAO said.For example, DOD has difficulty developing a complete inventory of major systems because it has different definitions of what constitutes a system. DHS cannot be sure all users have received the appropriate security training because its application counts the number of security courses completed but does not indicate whether someone has taken a specialized course, GAO said in the Oct. 1 report.These agencies also had problems correcting deficiencies and weaknesses, ensuring that employees receive information security training, and testing security controls. Of the four agencies, only Justice had accomplished full certification and accreditation of systems, and only State had implemented a common security configuration.Until the departments address their challenges and fully implement effective departmentwide information security programs, increased risk exists that they will not be able to effectively protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of their information and information systems, said Gregory Wilshusen, GAOs director of information security issues, in his report.DHS, Justice and State generally agreed with GAOs recommendations. DOD, however, disagreed with three of six recommendations.In general, this office does not believe the draft report accurately reflects the current security posture of the Department of Defense nor does it consider initiatives undertaken and progress the department has made in implementing the provisions of the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 over the last five years, said Robert Lentz, deputy assistant secretary of Defense for information and identity assurance.Examples of GAOs recommendations include:
- For DOD, to develop and apply a plan with milestones to finalize and implement a departmentwide definition of a major information system.
- For DHS, to coordinate with its workforce office to finalize deployment of the centralized online learning management system for tracking the IT security training of employees.
- For Justice, to reconcile duplications in its remediation plan tracking tool.
- For State, to strengthen its security control testing policies and ensure that its component agencies complete the required annual security control and contingency plan testing on all systems.
NEXT STORY: NASCIO: States face IT retirement crunch