Paul Light’s government score card

Paul Light, a professor at New York University’s Wagner School of Public Service, has written about government performance for 25 years. His new book, “A Government Ill Executed,” analyzes what he calls a crisis in government performance. He talked with former managing editor Florence Olsen about his book, the writings of Alexander Hamilton and a package of reforms that includes hiring 100,000 frontline federal workers. Alexander Hamilton, more than any of the founders, gave a great deal of thought to how government would work. He developed a set of principles that he pursued once in office as the first secretary of the Treasury. Some of those principles have worked out well and are still relevant today, and others have had unintended consequences.Hamilton believed in something called execution in detail. He set tight rules governing the Coast Guard [known in 1790 as the Revenue Cutter Service], custom houses and so forth, and for a tiny government at the time, that made a lot of sense. He demanded regular reports from the front lines of government about the implementation of the laws. For example, he wanted to make sure that all Coast Guard cutters carried a certain number of cannonballs. Of course, over time the layers of rules have become quite stifling, which is one of the unintended consequences of Hamilton’s notions. But he did believe in an energetic federal service. He thought that federal employees were essential to the faithful execution of the laws, and that is still absolutely true. We really don’t treat federal employees as if they are essential. We talk about employees as essential on snow days. Hamilton would be offended by that notion, I think, because Hamilton believed that every federal employee would be essential. It’s part of a package of reforms. I don’t think the specific proposals will work in isolation. My view is that we ought to take the baby boomer jobs as they are exited and decide where we want to put them. We’ve got this chance to revisit the hierarchy and put more workers on the front lines [for example, as safety inspectors of food, toys and airplanes]. Most of the scandals and breakdowns in government tend to involve the lack of frontline employees. My view is that we’ve got enough managers, and we’ve got too many layers of them. We don’t have enough frontline employees, and we’ve got to restock the pipeline of people who inspect the food, monitor contracts and do the computer programming. We’ve really got to confront that problem, and the baby boomer retirements give us that opportunity.Rudy Giuliani during the campaign was saying, “Baby boomers [are] retiring. Let’s eliminate half the jobs.” My view is we’ve got all these baby boomers retiring. Let’s get the front lines fully stocked, and then we can talk about refilling the higher-level baby boomer jobs. Most people at the upper pay grades are baby boomers, some of whom were promoted during repeated pay freezes in the past 30 years because that’s how we tried to retain them. Absolutely. I think the term is poorly defined. Mitch Daniels, former director of the Office of Management and Budget, had the Yellow Pages rule: If you can find it in the Yellow Pages, it’s commercially available [and not inherently governmental]. Public/private job competitions are based on the notion that anything that is commercially available is just fine for government work. If you can find it in the private sector, it is eligible for competition. I think there are inherently governmental jobs, and there are more of them than we report. Agencies are scared to use the Schedule A exemption [which protects small groups of employees from mandatory public/private job competitions]. NASA has worked very hard to protect its jobs through that exemption, but many agencies are intimidated by the job competitions. We really haven’t had a workable definition that can be consistently applied. The job competitions have been, for the most part, useless in helping us figure out where contracting out makes sense. One of the things I do like about the job competition process is the most efficient organization — the MEO. Of course, we ought to have most efficient organizations, but why do we restrict that only to job competitions? Why don’t we make all federal organizations most efficient organizations? Why is that something we do for a few thousand employees? I think you can always get productivity gains, but you can stretch the believability of how much you can get after a certain point. I don’t think we’re yet at that point. There are a lot of agencies that are still struggling to implement state-of-the-art systems — the Internal Revenue Service being a good example. IRS is still on [the Government Accountability Office’s] high-risk list because it hasn’t been able to get its customized system in place. I think there are still productivity gains to be made. They are likely to be made if we have within government strong oversight of contractor activity, and I worry that the acquisition corps in government has been weakened to the point that it no longer has the needed capacity to oversee the acquisition of the best technologies for delivering services.Information technology has been responsible for significant productivity gains, but there is a limit to how much those productivity gains can compensate for losses at the front lines of government. Moreover, federal employees complain that they don’t have good access to information technology, and I tend to believe them. The technologies are not reaching the bottom of the agencies, in part because of budget restrictions. At the end of the day, computer technologies might help a food inspector do his or her job, but if you’ve got only a handful of food inspectors, does technology help you with that? Short of heavy investments in robotics, how does information technology help an immigration inspector do his or her job, and how can we make it possible? We know that information technology will help the air traffic controller. Why does it take so long to get it? Information technology will help the IRS agent, but again, why does it take so long to get it? A fair number of lower and mid-level employees say that they are motivated more by the compensation than by the chance to make a difference. The public believes that, too. We interviewed feds and asked them about life in their organizations. Then we interviewed nonprofit employees, and we interviewed business employees. Feds ended up looking more like business employees in their basic motivation than I think is appropriate.Feds deserve a decent vacation, health benefits and a decent salary. That’s important. Young recruits are also dealing with the issue of paying off college loans. It may be feds are focusing on basic job security issues instead having a chance to make a difference because they’re frustrated by a lack of resources to do their jobs. That is one possible explanation. Let’s take the case of a food inspector at a slaughterhouse. He or she is working alone, doesn’t have much access to resources and is being pushed by political considerations to favor industry. Maybe they eventually give up and start to say, “Look, I can’t really do my job, but I sure do like the benefits and pay.” And that’s really a bad situation for government. I want you to be motivated primarily by the chance to make a difference, and then we can talk about pay and benefits that are commensurate with your responsibility. I don’t know. This is a very tough message. I’ve been working on government reform for 25 years and have produced more blank stares than a dark movie screen. I’m trying to reach the presidential candidates who have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity right now to work together to produce some legislation to improve performance. This is the first time in modern history where we’ve had two candidates from the United States Senate. [Republican Sen. John] McCain and [Democratic Sen. Barack] Obama could come together today and draft legislation to solve many of these problems. For example, they could make a commitment to hiring 100,000 new frontline employees next year. That would get the ball rolling. Cut the number of political appointees — that’s not hard to do. Reduce the number of management layers between the top and bottom. Create a special corps of young people who will enter government either at the beginning of their careers or at mid-career, so we can start replacing the baby boomers with the kind of talent we need. I’d be quite naive if I believed they were paying attention to this particular issue. This is not the stuff of which presidential dreams are made. They don’t sit around saying, “How can we strengthen government? How can we make sure that the promises we make are delivered?” They just don’t do that. I’m going to release a letter to the candidates in the next week or so, calling on them to act. I did raise the issue at an event [on June 9]. Obama’s campaign said they were looking at it — they were looking at cutting political appointees. But McCain, who actually introduced legislation three times in the 1990s to cut appointees, basically rejected the idea out of hand. I’m disappointed that his press people were so dismissive of an idea that actually originated with their candidate. I think I’ll spend my career banging my head against the wall. One of the messages I try to give in the book is the natural constituency for many of the reforms in this book are federal employees. They understand the problems. They want them fixed. They know what’s happening. They understand the layering problem. They know we’re having trouble recruiting young people. But it’s going to take a little bit of pain on their part, a little bit of pain on the part of the president and some action by Congress that may not be palatable. 


FCW: What is it about “The Federalist Papers” that made you choose them as a model for your critique of government operations today?
LIGHT:





FCW: How confident are you that replacing retiring baby boomers with more frontline employees could reform federal operations?
LIGHT:





FCW: In terms of outsourcing, do you think the concept of inherently governmental is still relevant and worth trying to preserve?
LIGHT:







FCW: Has the federal government reached the end of the line in terms of the benefits it can gain from information technology?
LIGHT:



FCW: In the book, you criticize the accepted wisdom that the government must do more with less. Has IT made that possible?
LIGHT:



FCW: You write that the federal government employs a workforce motivated more by pay, benefits and security than by the chance to make a difference, help people and pursue meaningful work. Is that observation based on your research?
LIGHT:





FCW: You write that the federal government is suffering its greatest crisis since it was founded. Does anyone besides you see the situation as dire?
LIGHT:



FCW: Are federal lawmakers reading this book? Are the presumptive presidential candidates reading it?
LIGHT:



FCW: Is this book going to be your final word on government performance? Are you moving on to other topics?
LIGHT:
X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.